Delfina Soto-Soto v. Merrick Garland

17 F.4th 975
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 18, 2021·No. 20-70587·Published·Cited by 36 cases

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DELFINA SOTO-SOTO, No. 20-70587 Petitioner, Agency No.

v. A209-406-355

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, ORDER Respondent.

Filed November 18, 2021

Before: J. Clifford Wallace and Milan D. Smith, Jr., Circuit Judges, and Jane A. Restani, * Judge.

ORDER

A judge sua sponte requested a vote on whether to rehear this matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of votes of the non-recused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. See Fed. R. App. P. 35.

Rehearing en banc is DENIED.

*

The Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge for the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Delfina Soto-Soto v. Merrick Garland, 17 F.4th 975 (9th Cir. 2021).

17 F.4th 975 (Delfina Soto-Soto v. Merrick Garland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related