Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Marzocco
This text of 677 N.E.2d 355 (Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Marzocco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On October 31, 1996, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline filed its Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommendation, regarding respondent, Ralph L. Marzocco, a.k.a. Ralph Louis Marzocco. On November 25, 1996, respondent filed his objections and brief in support. On March 21, 1997, relator filed a motion to strike respondent’s objections. Respondent filed a memo opposing the motion to strike on March 25, 1997. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to strike be, and is, hereby, denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that relator may file its answer brief on or before April 10,1997.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
677 N.E.2d 355, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1444, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 3639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dayton-bar-assn-v-marzocco-ohio-1997.