Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Marzocco

677 N.E.2d 355, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1444, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 3639
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Marzocco. Read the opinion of the Court — 79 Ohio St. 3d 186
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 1, 1997·No. 96-2434·Published

Opinion

On October 31, 1996, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline filed its Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommendation, regarding respondent, Ralph L. Marzocco, a.k.a. Ralph Louis Marzocco. On November 25, 1996, respondent filed his objections and brief in support. On March 21, 1997, relator filed a motion to strike respondent’s objections. Respondent filed a memo opposing the motion to strike on March 25, 1997. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to strike be, and is, hereby, denied.

Moyer, C.J., dissents.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that relator may file its answer brief on or before April 10,1997.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Marzocco, 677 N.E.2d 355, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1444, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 3639 (Ohio 1997).

677 N.E.2d 355 (Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Marzocco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.