Davis v. State
30 S.W.3d 925, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1652, 2000 WL 1702900
Opinion
ORDER
Daryl Davis appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.085 motion without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 81.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. State, 30 S.W.3d 925, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1652, 2000 WL 1702900 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).
30 S.W.3d 925 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.