Davis v. State
21 S.W.3d 864, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 274, 2000 WL 198178
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, William G. Davis, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. State, 21 S.W.3d 864, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 274, 2000 WL 198178 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).
21 S.W.3d 864 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.