Davis v. State
9 S.W.3d 683, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 2245, 1999 WL 1034478
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Darryl Davis, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Furthermore, no error of law appears as to mov-ant’s argument claiming the court erred in denying a continuance. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. State, 9 S.W.3d 683, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 2245, 1999 WL 1034478 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).
9 S.W.3d 683 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.