Davis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Davis v. State

81 S.W.3d 154, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 865, 2002 WL 753433

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 30, 2002

DocketNo. WD 59994

StatusPublished

This text of 81 S.W.3d 154 (Davis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. State, 81 S.W.3d 154, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 865, 2002 WL 753433 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

[155]*155 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Audrey Davis was convicted of second degree murder and armed criminal action. His conviction was affirmed on direct appeal. Davis sought Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief, claiming his constitutional rights were infringed by the State’s discovery violation and his counsel’s failure to locate a key witness for trial. He appeals the denial of the Rule 29.15 motion. For reasons stated in the Memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm the motion court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[155]*155 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Audrey Davis was convicted of second degree murder and armed criminal action. His conviction was affirmed on direct appeal. Davis sought Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief, claiming his constitutional rights were infringed by the State’s discovery violation and his counsel’s failure to locate a key witness for trial. He appeals the denial of the Rule 29.15 motion. For reasons stated in the Memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm the motion court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 S.W.3d 154, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 865, 2002 WL 753433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-state-moctapp-2002.