Davis v. State

701 So. 2d 119, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12259, 1997 WL 698013
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 5, 1997·No. No. 97-1352·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the State’s confession of error as well as our independent review of the record, we reverse the' summary denial of appellant’s postconviction motion to correct his sentence. When' appellant was sentenced for violating his community control, the trial court erroneously failed to credit him for time served in prison during the incareerative portion of his original split sentence. “[A] prisoner who is sentenced to prison for violating probation which constitutes the second portion of a [120]*120split sentence is entitled to credit for time actually served in prison, prior to commencement of the probationary term.” Sainvilus v. State, 689 So.2d 1261 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). See Tripp v. State, 622 So.2d 941, 942 (Fla.1993); Manning v. State, 696 So.2d 1186 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Smith v. State, 685 So.2d 1362, 1363 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Black v. State, 623 So.2d 641 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).

Accordingly, the matter is remanded to the trial court for correction of the sentencing order under review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. State, 701 So. 2d 119, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12259, 1997 WL 698013 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

701 So. 2d 119 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moore v. Stephens
804 So. 2d 575 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Powell v. State
763 So. 2d 364 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)