Davis v. State
659 So. 2d 346, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3609, 1995 WL 155572
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 608 So. 2d 540 →
Opinion
Appellant’s conviction for burglary is reversed. See Lee v. State, 640 So.2d 126 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Morse v. State, 604 So.2d 496 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); KW.U. v. State, 367 So.2d 647 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 378 So.2d 349 (Fla.1979); Chaudoin v. State, 362 So.2d 398 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). Appellant’s conviction for loitering is affirmed. See A.L.B. v. State, 399 So.2d 483 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). In view of our reversal of appellant’s burglary conviction, we do not reach the sentencing issue.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. State, 659 So. 2d 346, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3609, 1995 WL 155572 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
659 So. 2d 346 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Morse v. State
604 So. 2d 496 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Chaudoin v. State
362 So. 2d 398 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Lee v. State
640 So. 2d 126 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
A.L.B. v. State
399 So. 2d 483 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)