Davis v. State
603 So. 2d 116, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8866, 1992 WL 184035
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 560 So. 2d 1231 →
Opinion
The appellant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed. However, we note an ambiguity in the restitution order dated November 1, 1991. One provision of that order reflects that restitution is denied while another provides that it is ordered in the sum of $41,701.65. The record reflects that the court was not going to order it “at this time.” We therefore reverse the sentence in part and remand so that any ambiguity may be resolved.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. State, 603 So. 2d 116, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8866, 1992 WL 184035 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
603 So. 2d 116 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.