Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Manning v. State

Manning v. State

696 So. 2d 1186, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6774, 1996 WL 347131
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 26, 1996
DocketNo. 96-714
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 696 So. 2d 1186 (Manning v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Manning v. State, 696 So. 2d 1186, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6774, 1996 WL 347131 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Upon the State’s proper confession of error in Case No. 92-39709B, we reverse the summary denial of appellant’s postconviction motion to correct his sentence. When appellant was sentenced for violating his community control, the trial court erroneously failed to credit him for time served in prison during the incarcerative portion of his original split sentence. The matter is remanded to the trial court for the proper calculation and award of appellant’s prison time credit in Case No. 92-39709B. In Case No. 96-12628, we find no error and the order of the trial court is affirmed.

Reversed in part and remanded with instructions and affirmed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. State
701 So. 2d 119 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Cooper v. Kahn
696 So. 2d 1186 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Sainvilus v. State
689 So. 2d 1261 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
696 So. 2d 1186, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6774, 1996 WL 347131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manning-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.