Black v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Black v. State

614 So. 2d 1220, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3465, 1993 WL 86446

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 24, 1993

DocketNo. 91-03791

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 614 So. 2d 1220 (Black v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Black v. State, 614 So. 2d 1220, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3465, 1993 WL 86446 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

HALL, Acting Chief Judge.

The appellant, Clifford Black, contends that the trial court improperly ordered him to “maintain an hourly accounting of all [1221]*1221your activities on a daily log which you will submit to your Community Control officer upon request” as a condition of his community control. Black argues that since that condition was not pronounced at sentencing, nor is it authorized by statute, it should be stricken pursuant to Vinyard v. State, 586 So.2d 1301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). The state concedes on this point, and we agree.

Therefore, based on the authority of Vinyard, the above-referenced condition of Black’s community control is hereby stricken. Since we find no merit in the other issue Black raises on this appeal, the judgment of the trial court is otherwise affirmed.

PATTERSON and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HALL, Acting Chief Judge.

The appellant, Clifford Black, contends that the trial court improperly ordered him to “maintain an hourly accounting of all [1221]*1221your activities on a daily log which you will submit to your Community Control officer upon request” as a condition of his community control. Black argues that since that condition was not pronounced at sentencing, nor is it authorized by statute, it should be stricken pursuant to Vinyard v. State, 586 So.2d 1301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). The state concedes on this point, and we agree.

Therefore, based on the authority of Vinyard, the above-referenced condition of Black’s community control is hereby stricken. Since we find no merit in the other issue Black raises on this appeal, the judgment of the trial court is otherwise affirmed.

PATTERSON and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

614 So. 2d 1220, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3465, 1993 WL 86446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack