Davies Turner & Co. v. United States

45 C.C.P.A. 39, 1957 CCPA LEXIS 124
CourtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals
DecidedDecember 13, 1957
DocketNo. 4905
StatusPublished
Cited by25 cases

This text of 45 C.C.P.A. 39 (Davies Turner & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Customs and Patent Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davies Turner & Co. v. United States, 45 C.C.P.A. 39, 1957 CCPA LEXIS 124 (ccpa 1957).

Opinion

Worley, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an appeal from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, First Division, Abstract 60191, which overruled the importer’s-protest and sustained the collector in assessing certain merchandise with duty at the rate of 22 per centum ad valorem under the provision for bent-wood furniture in paragraph 412 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as-modified by the Presidential Proclamation relating to the Mexican Trade Agreement, T. D. 50797. The importer, appellant, contends [40]*40the merchandise should be assessed at 20 per centum ad valorem, as furniture wholly or in chief value of wood, not specially provided for, under the same paragraph, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802.

The pertinent portions of the paragraphs read:

Paragraph 412, as modified by T. D. 50797:

z8bCi5gLaCMBVwNWOJ4rszxV

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Selected Designs, Inc. v. United States
46 Cust. Ct. 461 (U.S. Customs Court, 1961)
American Express Co. v. United States
46 Cust. Ct. 383 (U.S. Customs Court, 1961)
Dux, Inc. v. United States
45 Cust. Ct. 289 (U.S. Customs Court, 1960)
Berge Norman, Inc. v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 479 (U.S. Customs Court, 1960)
National Carloading Corp. v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 351 (U.S. Customs Court, 1960)
John Stuart, Inc. v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 351 (U.S. Customs Court, 1960)
Dux Co. v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 351 (U.S. Customs Court, 1960)
Zacho & James Loudon & Co. v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 341 (U.S. Customs Court, 1960)
Frank P. Dow Co. v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 341 (U.S. Customs Court, 1960)
Zacho v. United States
43 Cust. Ct. 349 (U.S. Customs Court, 1959)
Selig Manufacturing Co. v. United States
43 Cust. Ct. 349 (U.S. Customs Court, 1959)
Mattoon & Co. v. United States
43 Cust. Ct. 343 (U.S. Customs Court, 1959)
Carson M. Simon & Co. v. United States
43 Cust. Ct. 343 (U.S. Customs Court, 1959)
Arbit Trading Co. v. United States
43 Cust. Ct. 305 (U.S. Customs Court, 1959)
S. Christian of Copenhagen, Inc. v. United States
42 Cust. Ct. 371 (U.S. Customs Court, 1959)
Design International Corp. v. United States
42 Cust. Ct. 350 (U.S. Customs Court, 1959)
George Tanier, Inc. v. United States
42 Cust. Ct. 331 (U.S. Customs Court, 1959)
Robinson Import Export Corp. v. United States
42 Cust. Ct. 298 (U.S. Customs Court, 1959)
We Moderns, Inc. v. United States
42 Cust. Ct. 287 (U.S. Customs Court, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 C.C.P.A. 39, 1957 CCPA LEXIS 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davies-turner-co-v-united-states-ccpa-1957.