Dux Co. v. United States

44 Cust. Ct. 351
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedFebruary 23, 1960
DocketNo. 63839; protests 58/2616, 58/13477, and 58/18720 (A) (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 44 Cust. Ct. 351 (Dux Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dux Co. v. United States, 44 Cust. Ct. 351 (cusc 1960).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of chairs similar in all material respects to those the subject of Davies Turner & Co. v. United States (45 C.C.P.A. 39, C.A.D. 669), the claim at 19 percent under the provision in paragraph 412, as modified, supra, for “Furniture, * * * Chairs,” was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of furniture the same as that in C.A.D. 669, supra, were held dutiable at 11% percent under the provision in said paragraph 412, as modified, supra, for other furniture.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davies Turner & Co. v. United States
45 C.C.P.A. 39 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 Cust. Ct. 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dux-co-v-united-states-cusc-1960.