Arbit Trading Co. v. United States

43 Cust. Ct. 305
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJuly 16, 1959
DocketNo. 63258; protest 320818-K (Philadelphia)
StatusPublished

This text of 43 Cust. Ct. 305 (Arbit Trading Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arbit Trading Co. v. United States, 43 Cust. Ct. 305 (cusc 1959).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of furniture similar in all material respects to those the subject of Davies Turner & Co. v. United States (45 C.C.P.A. 39, C.A.D. 669), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davies Turner & Co. v. United States
45 C.C.P.A. 39 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 Cust. Ct. 305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arbit-trading-co-v-united-states-cusc-1959.