Design International Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Design International Corp. v. United States

42 Cust. Ct. 350

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedApril 13, 1959

DocketNo. 62967; protest 58/9098 (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 42 Cust. Ct. 350 (Design International Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Design International Corp. v. United States, 42 Cust. Ct. 350 (cusc 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Moixison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of chairs similar in all material respects to those the subject of Davies Turner & Co. v. United States (45 C.C.P.A. 39, C.A.D. 669), the claim at 19 percent under the provision in paragraph 412, as modified, supra, for “Furniture, * * * Chairs,” was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of furniture the same as that in C.A.D. 669, supra, were held dutiable at 11% percent under the provision in said paragraph 412, as modified, supra, for other furniture.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Moixison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of chairs similar in all material respects to those the subject of Davies Turner & Co. v. United States (45 C.C.P.A. 39, C.A.D. 669), the claim at 19 percent under the provision in paragraph 412, as modified, supra, for “Furniture, * * * Chairs,” was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of furniture the same as that in C.A.D. 669, supra, were held dutiable at 11% percent under the provision in said paragraph 412, as modified, supra, for other furniture.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 Cust. Ct. 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/design-international-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack