D. Mark Katz v. National Archives and Records Administration

68 F.3d 1438, 314 U.S. App. D.C. 387, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 31923, 1995 WL 671369
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedNovember 14, 1995
Docket94-5265
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 68 F.3d 1438 (D. Mark Katz v. National Archives and Records Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
D. Mark Katz v. National Archives and Records Administration, 68 F.3d 1438, 314 U.S. App. D.C. 387, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 31923, 1995 WL 671369 (D.C. Cir. 1995).

Opinion

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH.

RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge:

D. Mark Katz appeals from the district court’s decision, on summary judgment, rejecting his claim that the National Archives and Records Administration violated the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, by failing to honor his request for “any and all photographs relevant to the autopsy” of President John F. Kennedy. Because these items were not agency records under the control of the Archives, we affirm.

I

After President Kennedy’s assassination on November 22,1963, his body was flown to Washington, D.C., and taken to the Bethesda Naval Hospital where federal doctors performed an autopsy. REPORT of the President’s Commission on the Assassination of Peesident John F. Kennedy 59-60 (1964). Navy personnel took photographs and x-rays of the body. Captain J.H. Stover, Commanding Officer of the U.S. Naval Medical School, delivered the exposed photographic film to Roy Kellerman, a Secret Service agent. At the same time, Commander John H. Ebersole, Acting Chief of Radiology, turned over the x-ray film to Kellerman. Vice Admiral George Burkley, the President’s personal physician, “accepted and approved” these actions.

Early the next morning, November 23, 1963, Kellerman delivered the exposed photographic and x-ray film to Secret Service agent Robert Bouek at the Executive Office Building. During the next few weeks, Secret Service personnel had the photographic film developed at the U.S. Navy Photographic Laboratory and returned the film and the prints to the Secret Service office in the Executive Office Building. For the next 17 months, the autopsy photographs and x-rays were stored in a safe in the Secret Service office in the Executive Office Building.

On April 22, 1965, Senator Robert F. Kennedy wrote to White House physician Admiral Burkley “authorizing]” him to release to Senator Kennedy’s custody “all of the material of President Kennedy, of which you have personal knowledge, and now being held by the Secret Service.” Senator Kennedy requested that Admiral Burkley personally accompany the material and turn it over to Evelyn Lincoln at the National Archives. Senator Kennedy further stated that Mrs. Lincoln was not authorized to release the material to anyone without his written permission. At that time, Mrs. Lincoln, who had been President Kennedy’s secretary, occupied a courtesy office in the National Archives building, but was not a government employee. Investigation of the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy, Appendix to Hearings Before the House Select Comm, on Assassinations, 95th Cong., 2d Sess., Vol. VII, at 25-26 (1979) (“House Select Comm. Appendix”). The materials, including the photographs and the x-rays, paraffin blocks of tissue samples, blood smears taken during various periods of President Kennedy’s life, and other items, were transferred to Mrs. Lincoln in a locked footloeker on April 26, 1965. No key accompanied the footloeker and the contents were not divulged to officials of the Archives.

In November 1965, Congress passed a statute providing for the acquisition of “all right, title, and interest” in evidence pertaining to the assassination. Pub.L. No. 89-318, 79 Stat. 1185 (1965). The statute gave the Attorney General one year to determine which items to acquire and provided a cause *1440 of action for owners of the items to obtain just compensation.

In September 1966, in response to a letter from Dr. John Nichols, Admiral Burkley stated that all medical records, other than those supplied to the Warren Commission, were “being held under the same conditions as the President’s private papers.”

In October 1966, Attorney General Ramsey Clark asked Senator Robert F. Kennedy about the government’s obtaining the autopsy photographs and x-rays pursuant to the 1965 statute. Senator Kennedy “was not sympathetic to the Government’s need to acquire the autopsy material.” House Select Comm. Appendix at 28. After “heated negotiations,” the Kennedy family agreed to donate the autopsy photographs and x-rays to the United States pursuant to the Presidential Libraries Act (then codified at 44 U.S.C. § 397(e)(1) (1964)). * House Select Comm. Appendix at 28. The deed’s restrictions were “to continue in effect during the lives of the late President’s widow, daughter, son, parents, brothers, and sisters, or any of them.” Only federal government officials investigating the death of President Kennedy or “recognized expert[s] in the field of pathology or related areas of science or technology, for serious purposes relevant to the investigation” of the death of President Kennedy were to be permitted access to the autopsy photographs and x-rays. Burke Marshall — the Kennedy family representative — was given authority to decide whether an expert seeking access to the materials had the requisite qualifications and purpose. The photographs and x-rays were transferred to officials at the National Archives on October 31, 1966.

In 1992, Congress passed the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act (“JFK Act”), in order to collect all government assassination records in the Archives and to provide for their timely public disclosure. Pub.L. No. 102-526, § 2(b), 106 Stat. 3443 (1992) (codified at 44 U.S.C. § 2107 note (Supp. IV 1992)). In defining what constituted an “assassination record” subject to disclosure, the JFK Act specifically excluded “autopsy records donated by the Kennedy family to the National Archives pursuant to a deed of gift regulating access to those records.” Pub.L. No. 102-526, § 3(2), 106 Stat. 3443, 3444 (1992).

II

Under FOIA, an agency must make “agency records” available to the public unless they fall within one of the statutory exemptions. 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(3), (a)(4)(B). Are the autopsy photographs and x-rays Katz requested “agency records”? To be so considered, an agency of the government must have created or obtained the records; and an agency must “be in control of the requested materials at the time the FOIA request is made.” U.S. Dep’t of Justice v. Tax Analysts, 492 U.S. 136, 145, 109 S.Ct. 2841, 2848, 106 L.Ed.2d 112 (1989). When Katz submitted his FOIA request, the Archives was not in control of the autopsy x-rays and photographs, or so it argues; the Kennedy family, pursuant to the deed conveying these materials to the federal government, controlled who could see them.

Katz answers that the deed is invalid. His argument is this. When the records were created they were “agency records” under the Records Disposal Act, ch. 5, 57 Stat. 380-83 (1943) (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. §§ 3301-3314

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Prison Legal News v. Charles E. Samuels, Jr.
787 F.3d 1142 (D.C. Circuit, 2015)
Catsouras v. Department of California Highway Patrol
181 Cal. App. 4th 856 (California Court of Appeal, 2010)
Wilson v. Drug Enforcement Administration
414 F. Supp. 2d 5 (District of Columbia, 2006)
Allan J. Favish v. Office of Independent Counsel
217 F.3d 1168 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)
Reid v. Pierce County
136 Wash. 2d 195 (Washington Supreme Court, 1998)
Tax Analysts v. United States Department of Justice
913 F. Supp. 599 (District of Columbia, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 F.3d 1438, 314 U.S. App. D.C. 387, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 31923, 1995 WL 671369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/d-mark-katz-v-national-archives-and-records-administration-cadc-1995.