Culliton v. Chase

22 P.2d 1049, 173 Wash. 309, 1933 Wash. LEXIS 630
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedJune 15, 1933
DocketNo. 24491. En Banc.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 22 P.2d 1049 (Culliton v. Chase) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Culliton v. Chase, 22 P.2d 1049, 173 Wash. 309, 1933 Wash. LEXIS 630 (Wash. 1933).

Opinions

ORDER.
The above-entitled consolidated causes having been argued on April 14, 1933, to the court, sitting En Banc (Judge Emmett N. Parker being absent because of illness), and the members of the court who heard the causes being equally divided in opinion as to the proper action to be taken on the appeal, four standing for affirmance of the judgment appealed from and four for its reversal, and there being consequently no constitutional majority of the court in favor either of reversal or affirmance;

IT IS ORDERED that the actions be held under advisement until further order of the court or until the causes can be reargued to the court composed of nine judges sitting En Banc.

Dated this 15th day of June, 1933.

By the Court: WALTER B. BEALS, Chief Justice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re the Estate of Lloyd
332 P.2d 44 (Washington Supreme Court, 1958)
Wool Growers Service Corp. v. Simcoe Sheep Co.
140 P.2d 512 (Washington Supreme Court, 1943)
Mills v. State Board of Equalization
33 P.2d 563 (Montana Supreme Court, 1934)
Reed v. Bjornson
253 N.W. 102 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 P.2d 1049, 173 Wash. 309, 1933 Wash. LEXIS 630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/culliton-v-chase-wash-1933.