Home/Supreme Court/Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

337 U.S. 913, 69 S. Ct. 1155, 93 L. Ed. 1724, 1949 U.S. LEXIS 2995
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 31, 1949
DocketNo. 694
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 337 U.S. 913 (Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 337 U.S. 913, 69 S. Ct. 1155, 93 L. Ed. 1724, 1949 U.S. LEXIS 2995 (1949).

Opinion

Certiorari granted limited to the question of the construction of § 8 (3) of the National Labor Relations Act of 1935 [49 Stat. 449, 29 U. S. C. § 158 (3)] in relation to this' [914]*914case.

Philip S. Ehrlich and Bartley C. Crum for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Robert N. Denham, David P. Findling, Ruth Weyand and Bernard Durum filed a memorandum for the National Labor Relations Board, respondent. Mathew O. Tobriner for the International Chemical Workers Union, A. F. of L., respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
338 U.S. 355 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
337 U.S. 913, 69 S. Ct. 1155, 93 L. Ed. 1724, 1949 U.S. LEXIS 2995, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colgate-palmolive-peet-co-v-national-labor-relations-board-scotus-1949.