Clemons v. State

357 S.W.3d 228, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1613, 2011 WL 6258459
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 6, 2011
DocketWD 72807
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 357 S.W.3d 228 (Clemons v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clemons v. State, 357 S.W.3d 228, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1613, 2011 WL 6258459 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Givon Clemons appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion following an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Clemons contends that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because he received ineffective assistance of counsel in that his trial counsel failed to adequately explain and convey the State’s guilty plea offer to him, and counsel erroneously advised him to waive his right to a jury trial. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moore v. State
357 S.W.3d 228 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
357 S.W.3d 228, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1613, 2011 WL 6258459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clemons-v-state-moctapp-2011.