Clemons v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Clemons v. State

303 S.W.3d 628, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 220, 2010 WL 623624

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 23, 2010

DocketED 92959

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 303 S.W.3d 628 (Clemons v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clemons v. State, 303 S.W.3d 628, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 220, 2010 WL 623624 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Reginald Clemons appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Reginald Clemons appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

303 S.W.3d 628, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 220, 2010 WL 623624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clemons-v-state-moctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack