Clemons v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Clemons v. State

406 S.W.3d 86, 2013 WL 4081024, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 943

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Clemons v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1613 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 13, 2013·No. No. ED 99215·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Matthew Clemons appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035¹ motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(h), (k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Mo. R. Civ. P. (2012).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Matthew Clemons appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035¹ motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(h), (k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Mo. R. Civ. P. (2012).

Clemons v. State, 406 S.W.3d 86, 2013 WL 4081024, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 943 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

406 S.W.3d 86 (Clemons v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.