Clark v. Cochran

80 So. 745, 77 Fla. 98
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 24, 1919
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 80 So. 745 (Clark v. Cochran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clark v. Cochran, 80 So. 745, 77 Fla. 98 (Fla. 1919).

Opinion

Ellis, J.

— Writ of error to the judgment of the Circuit Court for Franklin County in an action of ejectment brought by the plaintiffs in error against the defendants in error.

The certificate of the clerk to the transcript of record is defective in that it fails to state that the transcript contains “a correct transcript of the record of the judgment” in the case; nor does the certificate state that the transcript contains “a true and correct recital and copy of all such papers and proceedings in said cause as appears upon the records and files” of the clerk’s office “that have been directed to be included in said transcript by the written demands of the said parties.” See Special Rule 3, Rules of Circuit Courts; also Rule 103.

The writ of error is dismissed upon the authority of the above rules and the following decisions of this court: Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. Co. v. Lewallen, 56 Fla. 306, 47 South. Rep. 795; Keen v. State ex rel. Drane, 56 Fla. 241, 47 South. Rep. 924; Burnham v. Driggers, 44 Fla. 168, 32 South. Rep. 796; First Nat. Bank of Pensacola v. Oxford Lake Line, 45 Fla. 275, 34 South. Rep. 893; Dees v. Cassels, 54 Fla. 485, 44 South. Rep. 1013; Ramsey v. Wells, 36 Fla. 88, 18 South. Rep. 181; Merchants’ Nat. Bank of Jacksonville v. Grunthal, 38 Fla. 93, 20 South. Rep. 809; McRainey v. Jarrell, 59 Fla. 585, 52 South. Rep. 10.

The cause may be reinstated upon compliance with the terms of Chapter 5898, Laws of 1909, Sec. 1705a, Florida Compiled Laws, 1914.

Dismissed.

[100]*100Browne, C. J., and Taylor, Whitfield and West, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dorsey v. Griffins
124 So. 750 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)
Fain v. Bray
120 So. 764 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)
Porter v. Carroll
92 So. 809 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 So. 745, 77 Fla. 98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-cochran-fla-1919.