Burnham v. Driggers

44 Fla. 168
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 15, 1902
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 44 Fla. 168 (Burnham v. Driggers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burnham v. Driggers, 44 Fla. 168 (Fla. 1902).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A motion has been made to dismiss the appeal m this, a chancery, case.

The certificate of the clerk to the transcript certifies that certain numbered pages of the transcript contained a correct transcript of the record of the judgement in the above stated case, and a true and correct recital of such papers and proceedings in said cause, a® appeared upon the record and files of his office that had been directed to be included in the transcript by the written demands of the parties.

The decree in the case dissolved an injunction that had previously been granted and dismissed the bill, and the appeal, as appears from the recital before the court, was from the part of the decree dissolving the injunction as it was construed in the case of Stockton v. Harmon, 32 Fla. 312, 13 South. Rep. 833.

The attempted appeal must be dismissed both for the reasons that the certificate is defective, and that there can be no separate appeal from an order dissolving an injfinctio’n while there is a standing order dismissing the bill.

An order dismissing the appeal will be entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cottrell v. Amerkan
35 So. 2d 383 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1948)
Clark v. Cochran
80 So. 745 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1919)
Price v. Horton
80 So. 305 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1918)
Gunn Realty Co. v. Dutton
80 So. 51 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1918)
Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance v. Lewallen
56 Fla. 306 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1908)
Dees v. Cassels
54 Fla. 485 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1907)
Stanley v. Standard Cypress Co.
54 Fla. 583 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1907)
Akin v. Morgan
50 Fla. 172 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1905)
Wilder v. Dunne
45 Fla. 662 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1903)
First National Bank v. Oxford Lake Line
45 Fla. 275 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 Fla. 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burnham-v-driggers-fla-1902.