First National Bank v. Oxford Lake Line

Supreme Court of Florida

First National Bank v. Oxford Lake Line

45 Fla. 275

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJanuary 15, 1903

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 45 Fla. 275 (First National Bank v. Oxford Lake Line) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First National Bank v. Oxford Lake Line, 45 Fla. 275 (Fla. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The writ of error in this cause having been made returnable to the June term, 1900, of this court, and the cause having been reached in 'its regular order on the docket for final disposition and having been taken up for consideration by Division A of the court, and it ap[276]*276pearing to the court that the clerk’s certificate to the transcript certifies only that it contains a correct recital of the papers and proceedings in said cause without stating that it contains correct copies of such papers and proceedings, and that, therefore, no properly certified transcript of the record in said cause has ever been filed here, it is, therefore, hereby considered, ordered and adjudged that the writ of error in said cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed, at the cost of the plaintiff in error. Burham v. Driggers, 44 Fla. 168., 32 South. Rep. 796.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The writ of error in this cause having been made returnable to the June term, 1900, of this court, and the cause having been reached in 'its regular order on the docket for final disposition and having been taken up for consideration by Division A of the court, and it ap[276]*276pearing to the court that the clerk’s certificate to the transcript certifies only that it contains a correct recital of the papers and proceedings in said cause without stating that it contains correct copies of such papers and proceedings, and that, therefore, no properly certified transcript of the record in said cause has ever been filed here, it is, therefore, hereby considered, ordered and adjudged that the writ of error in said cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed, at the cost of the plaintiff in error. Burham v. Driggers, 44 Fla. 168., 32 South. Rep. 796.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 Fla. 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-bank-v-oxford-lake-line-fla-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack