Dorsey v. Griffins

124 So. 750, 98 Fla. 1020
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 26, 1929·Published

Opinions

This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree.

The words "and copy" are omitted from the certificate *Page 1021 of the clerk attached to the record. The certificate should show that the transcript contains a "true and correct recitaland copy of all such papers and proceedings" that were directed to be included therein by the parties, as provided by rules of court. Special Rule 3, Dees v. Cassels, 54 Fla. 485, 44 So. R. 1013; Clark v. Cochran, 77 Fla. 98, 80 So. R. 745 and cases therein cited.

The case should, therefore, be dismissed, but should be reinstated upon compliance with the terms of Section 4634, Comp. Gen. Laws of Florida.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dorsey v. Griffins, 124 So. 750, 98 Fla. 1020 (Fla. 1929).

124 So. 750 (Dorsey v. Griffins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dees v. Cassels
54 Fla. 485 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1907)
Clark v. Cochran
80 So. 745 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1919)