Dorsey v. Griffins

124 So. 750, 98 Fla. 1020
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedNovember 26, 1929
StatusPublished

This text of 124 So. 750 (Dorsey v. Griffins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dorsey v. Griffins, 124 So. 750, 98 Fla. 1020 (Fla. 1929).

Opinions

This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree.

The words "and copy" are omitted from the certificate *Page 1021 of the clerk attached to the record. The certificate should show that the transcript contains a "true and correct recitaland copy of all such papers and proceedings" that were directed to be included therein by the parties, as provided by rules of court. Special Rule 3, Dees v. Cassels, 54 Fla. 485, 44 So. R. 1013; Clark v. Cochran, 77 Fla. 98, 80 So. R. 745 and cases therein cited.

The case should, therefore, be dismissed, but should be reinstated upon compliance with the terms of Section 4634, Comp. Gen. Laws of Florida.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dees v. Cassels
54 Fla. 485 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1907)
Clark v. Cochran
80 So. 745 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 So. 750, 98 Fla. 1020, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorsey-v-griffins-fla-1929.