Claim of Stein v. Topol

217 A.D. 797
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 15, 1926·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The claimant was entitled to a schedule award of 205 weeks as for the loss of a foot on account of the amputation of Ms leg below the knee joint, wMch was made necessary by the accident. The atrophy in the knee above the joint was due to disuse of the leg in turn caused by the amputation. The schedule award for the loss of a foot by amputation is intended to cover all the results of an amputation, such as disuse, and no award based upon an atrophy due to disuse of the leg through loss of the foot can be superadded. All concur. Award reversed and claim dismissed, with costs against the State Industrial Board.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Stein v. Topol, 217 A.D. 797 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

217 A.D. 797 (Claim of Stein v. Topol) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Roular v. Henry Forge & Tool Co.
232 A.D. 857 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)
Claim of Dowling v. Church E. Gates & Co.
170 N.E. 511 (New York Court of Appeals, 1930)
Claim of Dowling v. Church E. Gates & Co.
227 A.D. 679 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)
Claim of Holderer v. Brooklyn City Railroad
224 A.D. 799 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1928)
Claim of Nycz v. Buffalo Body Corp.
221 A.D. 620 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)
Claim of Murray v. Consolidated Telegraph & Electrical Subway Co.
221 A.D. 811 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)