Claim of Roular v. Henry Forge & Tool Co.
This text of 232 A.D. 857 (Claim of Roular v. Henry Forge & Tool Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The award is for ninety per cent loss of use of the left arm. There was an amputation of claimant’s left arm about two inches below the elbow for which an award of schedule loss of the left hand was made and paid. The present award was based upon a later impairment of the remainder of the left arm due solely to atrophy, a condition naturally to be expected from the amputation. This loss by atrophy, resulting from amputation and disuse, cannot be superadded to the previous award. (Matter of Stein v. Topol, 217 App. Div. 797; Matter of Tannenbaum v. Baudouine, 218 id. 792; Matter of Bowling v. Gates, 227 id. 679.) All concur. Award reversed, with costs against the State Industrial Board.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
232 A.D. 857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-roular-v-henry-forge-tool-co-nyappdiv-1931.