Claim of Murray v. Consolidated Telegraph & Electrical Subway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Murray v. Consolidated Telegraph & Electrical Subway Co.

221 A.D. 811

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 15, 1927·Published

Opinion

Award reversed and claim remitted, with costs against the State Industrial Board to abide the event, on the ground that there is no evidence to support the finding that claimant in the accident of February 29,1924, sustained a fracture of a bone in his right ankle. Furthermore, if an award is proper it should be limited to 205 weeks as for the loss of a foot. (See Matter of Stein v. Topol, 217 App. Div. 797.) Cochrane, P. J., Van Kirk, Hinman, Davis and Whitmyer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Award reversed and claim remitted, with costs against the State Industrial Board to abide the event, on the ground that there is no evidence to support the finding that claimant in the accident of February 29,1924, sustained a fracture of a bone in his right ankle. Furthermore, if an award is proper it should be limited to 205 weeks as for the loss of a foot. (See Matter of Stein v. Topol, 217 App. Div. 797.) Cochrane, P. J., Van Kirk, Hinman, Davis and Whitmyer, JJ., concur.

Claim of Murray v. Consolidated Telegraph & Electrical Subway Co., 221 A.D. 811 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

221 A.D. 811 (Claim of Murray v. Consolidated Telegraph & Electrical Subway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related