Claim of Dowling v. Church E. Gates & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Dowling v. Church E. Gates & Co.

227 A.D. 679

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 15, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 227 A.D. 679 (Claim of Dowling v. Church E. Gates & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Dowling v. Church E. Gates & Co., 227 A.D. 679 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

—Award modified by reducing it to a loss of one hundred per cent of the right foot, and as so modified affirmed, without costs, on the authority of Matter of Stein v. Topol (217 App. Div. 797); Matter of Tannebaum v. Estate of Baudouine (218 id. 792); Matter of Murray v. Consolidated Telegraph & Elec. Subway Co. (221 id. 811). Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman and Whitmyer, JJ., concur; Davis and Hill, JJ., dissent as to the modification and vote for affirmance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Award modified by reducing it to a loss of one hundred per cent of the right foot, and as so modified affirmed, without costs, on the authority of Matter of Stein v. Topol (217 App. Div. 797); Matter of Tannebaum v. Estate of Baudouine (218 id. 792); Matter of Murray v. Consolidated Telegraph & Elec. Subway Co. (221 id. 811). Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman and Whitmyer, JJ., concur; Davis and Hill, JJ., dissent as to the modification and vote for affirmance.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

227 A.D. 679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-dowling-v-church-e-gates-co-nyappdiv-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack