City of Portland v. Bureau of Labor & Industries

668 P.2d 433, 64 Or. App. 341
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedOctober 25, 1983
Docket29-78; CA A21748
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 668 P.2d 433 (City of Portland v. Bureau of Labor & Industries) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Portland v. Bureau of Labor & Industries, 668 P.2d 433, 64 Or. App. 341 (Or. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinions

[343]*343VANHOOMISSEN, J.

In our earlier opinion, we reversed a finding by the Commissioner that petitioner had committed an unlawful employment practice under ORS 659.030(1) (1975) by discriminating against claimant because of her sex. We upheld the Commissioner’s finding that petitioner had unlawfully retaliated against claimant because of her complaints of discrimination. ORS 659.030(4) (1975). We therefore reversed the Commissioner’s award of back pay; however, we remanded a damage award of $15,000 for emotional distress, which at one point in the Commissioner’s findings was tied only to petitioner’s “unlawful employment practices,” because we were unable to determine if that award was compensation for claimant’s discrimination claim, which we reversed, or for her retaliation claim, which we upheld.

In their petitions for reconsideration, claimant and the Commissioner cite other portions of the Commissioner’s findings which clearly state that claimant’s mental suffering resulted only from petitioner’s unlawful retaliation and not from any pay disparity, and that the $15,000 award was intended to compensate claimant for damages she suffered because of the retaliation alone.

Reconsideration granted; modified to affirm the $15,000 damage award for retaliation; affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker v. Van Laningham
148 P.3d 391 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2006)
Flug v. University of Oregon
13 P.3d 544 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2000)
Salt Lake City Corp. v. Kasler Corp.
855 F. Supp. 1560 (D. Utah, 1994)
Forsberg v. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co.
840 F.2d 1409 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)
City of Portland v. Bureau of Labor & Industries
690 P.2d 475 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1984)
McQuary v. Bel Air Convalescent Home, Inc.
684 P.2d 21 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1984)
Stocking v. Fred Meyer, Inc.
683 P.2d 1021 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1984)
City of Portland v. Bureau of Labor & Industries
668 P.2d 433 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
668 P.2d 433, 64 Or. App. 341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-portland-v-bureau-of-labor-industries-orctapp-1983.