City of Baton Rouge v. Short

Supreme Court of Louisiana

City of Baton Rouge v. Short

341 So. 2d 411, 1977 La. LEXIS 5494

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 13, 1977

DocketNo. 58973

StatusPublished

This text of 341 So. 2d 411 (City of Baton Rouge v. Short) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Baton Rouge v. Short, 341 So. 2d 411, 1977 La. LEXIS 5494 (La. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Paul B. Short applying for Writs of Certiorari and Stay Order.

Granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Ben R. Miller, Judge of the City Court of Baton Rouge, for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, as soon as possible, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.-

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 31st day of January, 1977, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Paul B. Short applying for Writs of Certiorari and Stay Order.

Granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Ben R. Miller, Judge of the City Court of Baton Rouge, for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, as soon as possible, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.-

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 31st day of January, 1977, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

341 So. 2d 411, 1977 La. LEXIS 5494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-baton-rouge-v-short-la-1977.