Church of Scientology of California v. Shirley Foley

D.C. Circuit

Church of Scientology of California v. Shirley Foley

640 F.2d 1335, 205 U.S. App. D.C. 364

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided October 20, 1981·No. 77-2134·Published·Cited by 31 cases

Opinions

Judgment PER CURIAM.

Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge MacKINNON.

Dissenting opinion, in which Circuit Judges EDWARDS and GINSBURG join, filed by Circuit Judge SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and was argued by counsel before the court en banc. While the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion, they have been accorded full consideration by the court. See Local Rule 13(c).

This court is of the view that the complaint filed in this case was properly dismissed by the District Court, basically for [1336] the reason stated in its order filed October 27, 1977.

On consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED by this court that the judgment of the District Court appealed from in this cause is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment PER CURIAM.

Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge MacKINNON.

Dissenting opinion, in which Circuit Judges EDWARDS and GINSBURG join, filed by Circuit Judge SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and was argued by counsel before the court en banc. While the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion, they have been accorded full consideration by the court. See Local Rule 13(c).

This court is of the view that the complaint filed in this case was properly dismissed by the District Court, basically for [1336] the reason stated in its order filed October 27, 1977.

On consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED by this court that the judgment of the District Court appealed from in this cause is hereby affirmed.

Church of Scientology of California v. Shirley Foley, 640 F.2d 1335, 205 U.S. App. D.C. 364 (D.C. Cir. 1981).

Pincite

640 F.2d 1335 (Church of Scientology of California v. Shirley Foley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

69 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1255, 66 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43,684 Peggy M. Spicer v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Corrections, and Buckingham Correctional Center David Smith, in His Capacity as the Warden of Buckingham Correctional Center, Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Corrections J.M. Perutelli, Captain, Peggy M. Spicer v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Corrections Buckingham Correctional Center Buckingham Correctional Center David Smith, in His Capacity as the Warden of Buckingham Correctional Center, Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Corrections J.M. Perutelli, Captain

66 F.3d 705 (Fourth Circuit, 1995)

Spicer v. Virginia

66 F.3d 705 (Fourth Circuit, 1995)

United States v. Church of Scientology Western United States

973 F.2d 715 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)

United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Church of Scientology Western United States and Cal Cole, President, Defendants-Appellees/ Cross-Appellants. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Church of Scientology International and Lynn Farny, Secretary, Defendants-Appellees/cross-Appellants

973 F.2d 715 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)

Air Line Pilots Association, International v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Transport Workers Union of America, Afl-Cio v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., International Association of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Texas Air Corporation in Re Eastern Air Lines, Inc

863 F.2d 891 (D.C. Circuit, 1988)

Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.

863 F.2d 891 (D.C. Circuit, 1988)

Mary Bartlett, on Behalf of Josephine Neuman v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary, Health and Human Services. James T. Martin, Jr. v. D.C. Metropolitan Police Department Richard Xander, United States of America v. Christine Meyer

824 F.2d 1240 (D.C. Circuit, 1987)

Bartlett ex rel. Neuman v. Bowen

824 F.2d 1240 (D.C. Circuit, 1987)

Deborah Ferguson, Kathleen Rabjohns, and Michael Rabjohns v. Hospital Corporation International, Ltd.

776 F.2d 105 (Fifth Circuit, 1985)

United States v. MacIo Singleton

763 F.2d 1432 (D.C. Circuit, 1985)

Jane Doe v. United States Department of Justice

753 F.2d 1092 (D.C. Circuit, 1985)

Doe v. United States Department of Justice

602 F. Supp. 871 (District of Columbia, 1983)

Richard Arnold, IV v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. United States of America, Francis C. Mihalek v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. United States of America, Helen Rae Weston, as of the Estate of Lewis M. Weston, Deceased v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., the Aetna Casualty and Surety Company Aetna Insurance Company American Empire Insurance Company Commercial Union Insurance Company Compagnies D'AssurAnces Du Groupe Concorde Continental Casualty Company Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of Wisconsin Hartford Fire Insurance Company Industrial Indemnity Company Maryland Casualty Company Reliance Insurance Company Royal Indemnity Company St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company Security Insurance Company of Hartford the Travelers Indemnity Company Underwriters at Lloyd's and Associated British Insurance Companies United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company United States Fire Insurance Company Zurich Insurance Company v. United States of America Bernard C. Groseclose Alden E. Hare William L. Hogan Dennis L. Hunter

712 F.2d 899 (Fourth Circuit, 1983)

Opinions

Related