Chandler v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Chandler v. State

230 S.W. 999

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMay 11, 1921

DocketNo. 6250

StatusPublished

This text of 230 S.W. 999 (Chandler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chandler v. State, 230 S.W. 999 (Tex. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

HAWKINS, J.

Appellant was convicted for selling intoxicating liquor to one J. M. Peel.

• A requested charge on accomplice testimony was refused. The facts made it necessary to give such charge under the case Robert v. State, [1000]*1000228 S. W. 230, and many since following it. However, none of these had been delivered when this case was tried.

Eor the error in not giving the requested charge, the judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWKINS, J.

Appellant was convicted for selling intoxicating liquor to one J. M. Peel.

• A requested charge on accomplice testimony was refused. The facts made it necessary to give such charge under the case Robert v. State, [1000]*1000228 S. W. 230, and many since following it. However, none of these had been delivered when this case was tried.

Eor the error in not giving the requested charge, the judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 S.W. 999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chandler-v-state-texcrimapp-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack