Chandler v. State
230 S.W. 999, 89 Tex. Crim. 315, 1921 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 461
Opinion
Appellant was convicted for selling intoxicating liquor to one J. M. Peel.
A requested charge on accomplice testimony was refused. The facts made it necessary to give such charge under the case, Robert v. State, 88 Texas Crim. Rep., 488, 288 S. W. Rep., 230, and many since following it. However, none of these had been delivered when this case was tried.
For the error in not giving the requested charge, the judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded.
Reversed arid remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chandler v. State, 230 S.W. 999, 89 Tex. Crim. 315, 1921 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 461 (Tex. 1921).
230 S.W. 999 (Chandler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Privitt v. State
98 S.W.2d 204 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Miller v. State
263 S.W. 919 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)
Reed v. State
245 S.W. 432 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)
Reep v. State
245 S.W. 432 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)