Chandler v. State
231 S.W. 108, 89 Tex. Crim. 299, 1921 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 450
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquors.
The State relied solely upon the testimony of the alleged purchaser of the liquor. He was an accomplice, and in the absence of any corroborating facts, the evidence is insufficient. Franklin v. State, 88 Texas Crim. Rep., 342, 227 S. W. Rep., 486.
The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chandler v. State, 231 S.W. 108, 89 Tex. Crim. 299, 1921 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 450 (Tex. 1921).
231 S.W. 108 (Chandler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Flint
269 P. 476 (Utah Supreme Court, 1928)
Colter v. State
252 S.W. 168 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1923)