Chakford v. Strum

87 So. 2d 419
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 2, 1956
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 87 So. 2d 419 (Chakford v. Strum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chakford v. Strum, 87 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 1956).

Opinion

87 So.2d 419 (1956)

Rose CHAKFORD and Henry Chakford, Sr., Appellants,
v.
Sanford Z. STRUM, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division B.

May 2, 1956.
Rehearing Denied May 24, 1956.

*420 L.S. Julian and Shutts, Bowen, Simmons, Prevatt & Julian Miami, for appellants.

Jeptha P. Marchant and Joseph A. Perkins, Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The record and briefs have been carefully examined. The case was tried by the Circuit Judge upon a waiver of the jury by the parties. His factual findings in favor of the appellee are entitled to the weight of a jury verdict and will not be disturbed unless it is shown that there is a total lack of substantial evidence to support his conclusion. The record reveals adequate support for the findings and conclusion of the trial judge.

The judgment is, therefore, affirmed on the authority of the rule announced in MacGregor v. Sachs, Fla. 1952, 57 So.2d 426; Read v. Frizzell, Fla. 1952, 60 So.2d 172; King v. Griner, Fla. 1952, 60 So.2d 177; First Atlantic Nat. Bank v. Cobbett, Fla. 1955, 82 So.2d 870.

Affirmed.

DREW, C.J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS and THORNAL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McKelvey v. McKelvey
570 So. 2d 1127 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Cohen-Ager, Inc. v. State
504 So. 2d 1332 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Gruman v. State, Dept. of Revenue
379 So. 2d 1313 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Flagler Ctr. Bldg Loan Corp. v. Chem Realty Corp.
363 So. 2d 344 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Graulich v. FREDERIC H. BERLOWE & ASSOCIATES
338 So. 2d 1109 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Strawgate v. Turner
339 So. 2d 1112 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)
Greyhound Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Austin
298 So. 2d 345 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)
Kirk v. Thompson
221 So. 2d 168 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Southeast Foods, Inc. v. Penguin Frozen Foods
203 So. 2d 39 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Gaisford v. Frostman
202 So. 2d 790 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Ainsley Realty Co. v. Kramer
198 So. 2d 640 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
LaFrance Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. Argenio
147 So. 2d 330 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Schanker v. Wollowick
143 So. 2d 509 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Bardee Corporation v. Arnold Altex Aluminum Co.
134 So. 2d 268 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)
Larnel Builders, Inc. v. Nicholas
123 So. 2d 284 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
Penzi v. David
122 So. 2d 635 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
Krohne v. Orlando Farming Corporation
102 So. 2d 399 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 So. 2d 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chakford-v-strum-fla-1956.