Ainsley Realty Co. v. Kramer

198 So. 2d 640, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4779
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 9, 1967
DocketNo. 65-329
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 198 So. 2d 640 (Ainsley Realty Co. v. Kramer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ainsley Realty Co. v. Kramer, 198 So. 2d 640, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4779 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

"PER CURIAM.

Defendant Ainsley Realty Company appeals from a final judgment, in a non-jury trial, in favor of the plaintiff, Richard I. Kramer.

The court’s findings are entitled to the weight of a jury verdict and will not be disturbed unless it is shown that there is a total lack of substantial evidence to support his conclusions. Chakford v. Strum, Fla. 1956, 87 So.2d 419.

We hold that the record reveals adequate support for the findings and conclusions of the trial judge. Finding no error the judgment appealed is affirmed.

A.ffirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Massachusetts Casualty Insurance v. Johansen
270 So. 2d 397 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)
2765 South Bayshore Drive Corp. v. Fred Howland, Inc.
212 So. 2d 911 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Reese v. Reese
212 So. 2d 33 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Latham
207 So. 2d 733 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Southeast Foods, Inc. v. Penguin Frozen Foods
203 So. 2d 39 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 So. 2d 640, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ainsley-realty-co-v-kramer-fladistctapp-1967.