Ainsley Realty Co. v. Kramer
198 So. 2d 640, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4779
Opinion
Defendant Ainsley Realty Company appeals from a final judgment, in a non-jury trial, in favor of the plaintiff, Richard I. Kramer.
The court’s findings are entitled to the weight of a jury verdict and will not be disturbed unless it is shown that there is a total lack of substantial evidence to support his conclusions. Chakford v. Strum, Fla. 1956, 87 So.2d 419.
We hold that the record reveals adequate support for the findings and conclusions of the trial judge. Finding no error the judgment appealed is affirmed.
A.ffirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ainsley Realty Co. v. Kramer, 198 So. 2d 640, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4779 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).
198 So. 2d 640 (Ainsley Realty Co. v. Kramer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Massachusetts Casualty Insurance v. Johansen
270 So. 2d 397 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)
2765 South Bayshore Drive Corp. v. Fred Howland, Inc.
212 So. 2d 911 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Reese v. Reese
212 So. 2d 33 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Latham
207 So. 2d 733 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Southeast Foods, Inc. v. Penguin Frozen Foods
203 So. 2d 39 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)