American Continental Investment, Inc. v. Borofsky

87 So. 2d 419, 1956 Fla. LEXIS 3721
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 9, 1956·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to 31 F.S.A. Rule 38 of the Rules of this court and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

DREW, C. J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON and THORNAL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

American Continental Investment, Inc. v. Borofsky, 87 So. 2d 419, 1956 Fla. LEXIS 3721 (Fla. 1956).

87 So. 2d 419 (American Continental Investment, Inc. v. Borofsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chakford v. Strum
87 So. 2d 419 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)