McKelvey v. McKelvey

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McKelvey v. McKelvey

570 So. 2d 1127, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9299, 1990 WL 198302

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McKelvey v. McKelvey. Read the opinion of the Court — 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2583 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 11, 1990·No. No. 89-234·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There is ample, although disputed, evidence which supports the trial judge’s action in upholding the validity of the parties’ antenuptial agreement, see Casto v. Casto, 508 So.2d 330 (Fla.1987); Del Vecchio v. Del Vecchio, 143 So.2d 17 (Fla.1962); Bubenik v. Bubenik, 392 So.2d 943 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), as well as the other determinations challenged on this appeal. We are therefore bound to uphold the final judgment entered below in all respects. Marsh v. Marsh, 419 So.2d 629, 630 (Fla.1982); Strawgate v. Turner, 339 So.2d 1112, 1113 (Fla.1976); Chakford v. Strum, 87 So.2d 419, 420 (Fla.1956).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

There is ample, although disputed, evidence which supports the trial judge’s action in upholding the validity of the parties’ antenuptial agreement, see Casto v. Casto, 508 So.2d 330 (Fla.1987); Del Vecchio v. Del Vecchio, 143 So.2d 17 (Fla.1962); Bubenik v. Bubenik, 392 So.2d 943 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), as well as the other determinations challenged on this appeal. We are therefore bound to uphold the final judgment entered below in all respects. Marsh v. Marsh, 419 So.2d 629, 630 (Fla.1982); Strawgate v. Turner, 339 So.2d 1112, 1113 (Fla.1976); Chakford v. Strum, 87 So.2d 419, 420 (Fla.1956).

Affirmed.

McKelvey v. McKelvey, 570 So. 2d 1127, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9299, 1990 WL 198302 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

570 So. 2d 1127 (McKelvey v. McKelvey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related