McKelvey v. McKelvey
This text of 570 So. 2d 1127 (McKelvey v. McKelvey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There is ample, although disputed, evidence which supports the trial judge’s action in upholding the validity of the parties’ antenuptial agreement, see Casto v. Casto, 508 So.2d 330 (Fla.1987); Del Vecchio v. Del Vecchio, 143 So.2d 17 (Fla.1962); Bubenik v. Bubenik, 392 So.2d 943 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), as well as the other determinations challenged on this appeal. We are therefore bound to uphold the final judgment entered below in all respects. Marsh v. Marsh, 419 So.2d 629, 630 (Fla.1982); Strawgate v. Turner, 339 So.2d 1112, 1113 (Fla.1976); Chakford v. Strum, 87 So.2d 419, 420 (Fla.1956).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
570 So. 2d 1127, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9299, 1990 WL 198302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckelvey-v-mckelvey-fladistctapp-1990.