McKelvey v. McKelvey

534 So. 2d 801, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2583, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5138, 1988 WL 123819
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 22, 1988
DocketNos. 88-1527, 88-1602
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 534 So. 2d 801 (McKelvey v. McKelvey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McKelvey v. McKelvey, 534 So. 2d 801, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2583, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5138, 1988 WL 123819 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The wife brings consolidated appeals from the trial court’s orders on undifferentiated temporary alimony and support and on the wife’s motion to consider tax consequences. In its order on the wife’s motion to consider tax consequences, the trial court made the following rulings:

1. The Ten Thousand ($10,000.00) Dollar cash amount paid by the Husband to the Wife each month shall be taxable to the Wife and deductible by the Husband.
2. Regarding the household expenses, fifty percent will be considered as temporary alimony taxable to the Wife and deductible to the Husband.
3. Any amounts charged by the Wife on the Visa card shall be considered as alimony and shall be taxable to the Wife and deductible by the Husband.
4. Any matters not taken into consideration by this Order shall be considered at a Final Hearing in this cause.

These rulings indicate that the trial court intended the wife to be liable for taxes on the entire support award except for one-half of the payments made by the husband for household expenses. To clarify the trial court’s rulings, we remand for the entry of a corrective order which will designate one-half of the payments for household expenses made by the husband as “not taxable to the recipient and not allowable as a deduction to the payor” under the appropriate sections of the Internal Revenue Code.

The wife’s remaining points are without merit.

Remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Friedman v. Friedman
844 So. 2d 789 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
534 So. 2d 801, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2583, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5138, 1988 WL 123819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckelvey-v-mckelvey-fladistctapp-1988.