Campbell v. State
This text of 647 S.W.2d 660 (Campbell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION ON APPELLANTS’ PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Appellants were convicted of the offense of aggravated robbery, and punishment was assessed at imprisonment for 30 years. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Campbell v. State, 644 S.W.2d 154 (Tex.App.—Austin, 1982).
We agree with the Court of Appeals that Appellants’ convictions should be affirmed. Accordingly, Appellants’ petitions for discretionary review will be refused. As is true in every case, refusal of discretionary review by this Court does not constitute an endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals.
Appellants’ petitions for discretionary review are refused.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of March, 1983.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
647 S.W.2d 660, 1983 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-state-texcrimapp-1983.