Johnson v. State
This text of 786 S.W.2d 709 (Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[710]*710OPINION ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
Our opinion on original submission is withdrawn.
Appellant was convicted of the offense of aggravated sexual assault. V.T.C.A., Penal Code § 22.021. His punishment was assessed by the jury at twenty years imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Johnson v. State, 709 S.W.2d 345 (Tex.App.—Houston (14th Dist.) 1986).
Pursuant to Rule 202(k), T.R.App.Proc. we dismiss appellant’s petition for discretionary review as having been improvidently granted. As is true in every case, refus-' al or dismissal of a petition for discretionary review by this Court does not constitute an endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the court of appeals. See Sheffield v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App.1983), Campbell v. State, 647 S.W.2d 660 (Tex.Cr.App.1983).
Appellant’s petition for discretionary review is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
786 S.W.2d 709, 1989 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 119, 1989 WL 60482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-state-texcrimapp-1989.