Redd v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Redd v. State

731 S.W.2d 96, 1987 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 607

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 10, 1987

DocketNo. 805-86

StatusPublished

This text of 731 S.W.2d 96 (Redd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Redd v. State, 731 S.W.2d 96, 1987 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 607 (Tex. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Appeal is taken from a conviction for the offense of theft of property of a value of $750.00 or more but less than $20,000.00. Appellant was convicted in a trial before the court following his plea of guilty. Punishment was assessed at 7 years. The Court of Appeals reversed appellant’s conviction after finding the trial court erred in overruling a motion to suppress evidence. Redd v. State, 712 S.W.2d 615 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st] 1986).

As in every case, this Court’s decision to refuse a petition for discretionary review should not be construed as approval by this Court of the language or reasoning used by the Court of Appeals in reaching its decision. Campbell v. State, 647 S.W.2d 660 (Tex.Cr.App.1983).

The State’s petition for discretionary review is refused.

ONION, P.J., and McCORMICK and WHITE, JJ., would grant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI