Ramirez v. State

731 S.W.2d 96, 1987 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 606
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ramirez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1984 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 718
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 10, 1987·No. No. 0841-86·Published

Opinion

[97]*97OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Appeal is taken from a conviction for the offense of burglary of a vehicle. After the jury found appellant guilty, the court assessed punishment at 4 years, probated. The Court of Appeals reversed appellant’s conviction and reformed the judgment to an acquittal after finding the evidence insufficient to support the conviction. Ramirez v. State, 711 S.W.2d 408 (Tex.App.—El Paso 1986).

As in every case, this Court’s decision to refuse a petition for discretionary review should not be construed as approval by this Court of the language or reasoning used by the Court of Appeals in reaching its decision. Campbell v. State, 647 S.W.2d 660 (Tex.Cr.App.1983).

The State’s petition for discretionary review is refused.

ONION, P.J., and DAVIS and McCORMICK, JJ., would grant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ramirez v. State, 731 S.W.2d 96, 1987 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 606 (Tex. 1987).

731 S.W.2d 96 (Ramirez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Campbell v. State
647 S.W.2d 660 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1983)
Ramirez v. State
711 S.W.2d 408 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1986)