Ramirez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Ramirez v. State

731 S.W.2d 96, 1987 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 606

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 10, 1987

DocketNo. 0841-86

StatusPublished

This text of 731 S.W.2d 96 (Ramirez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ramirez v. State, 731 S.W.2d 96, 1987 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 606 (Tex. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

[97]*97OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Appeal is taken from a conviction for the offense of burglary of a vehicle. After the jury found appellant guilty, the court assessed punishment at 4 years, probated. The Court of Appeals reversed appellant’s conviction and reformed the judgment to an acquittal after finding the evidence insufficient to support the conviction. Ramirez v. State, 711 S.W.2d 408 (Tex.App.—El Paso 1986).

As in every case, this Court’s decision to refuse a petition for discretionary review should not be construed as approval by this Court of the language or reasoning used by the Court of Appeals in reaching its decision. Campbell v. State, 647 S.W.2d 660 (Tex.Cr.App.1983).

The State’s petition for discretionary review is refused.

ONION, P.J., and DAVIS and McCORMICK, JJ., would grant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI