Bydlon v. United States

175 F. Supp. 891, 146 Ct. Cl. 764, 1959 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 180
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedJuly 15, 1959
Docket421-55, 480-55
StatusPublished
Cited by23 cases

This text of 175 F. Supp. 891 (Bydlon v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bydlon v. United States, 175 F. Supp. 891, 146 Ct. Cl. 764, 1959 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 180 (cc 1959).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

This is an action by the plaintiffs for the taking of their property as a result of the proclamation of Executive Order No. 10092, dated December 17, 1949, which banned and prohibited travel by air below 4,000 feet over the roadless areas of the Superior National Forest in northern Minnesota.

This ease was referred by the court, pursuant to Rule 45(a), 28 U.S.C.A., to Trial Commissioner C. Murray Bernhardt, with directions to make findings of fact and recommendations for conclusions of law which he has done in his report filed September 8, 1958.

The court, having considered the evidence, the briefs and argument of counsel, adopts the findings and opinion of the Trial Commissioner with slight modifications.

The plaintiffs, Zupancich and Skala, are entitled to recover just compensation in the respective amounts of $25,000 and $30,000, with interest thereon at four percent per annum from January 1, 1952, to date of payment as part of just compensation, and judgment will be entered to that effect. The petition as to the other plaintiff in case No. 421-55 will be dismissed, and the petition in case No. 480-55 will also be dismissed.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grill v. United States
Federal Claims, 2021
Palmyra Pacific Seafoods, L.L.C. v. United States
561 F.3d 1361 (Federal Circuit, 2009)
Roth v. United States
73 Fed. Cl. 144 (Federal Claims, 2006)
Sweetwater, A Wilderness Lodge LLC v. United States
72 Fed. Cl. 208 (Federal Claims, 2006)
Air Pegasus of d.c., Inc. v. United States
424 F.3d 1206 (Federal Circuit, 2005)
Air Pegasus of D.C., Inc. v. United States
60 Fed. Cl. 448 (Federal Claims, 2004)
Lake Pleasant Group v. United States
32 Fed. Cl. 429 (Federal Claims, 1994)
E-Systems, Inc. v. United States
2 Cl. Ct. 271 (Court of Claims, 1983)
Frisco Land & Mining Co. v. State of California
74 Cal. App. 3d 736 (California Court of Appeal, 1977)
Benenson v. United States
548 F.2d 939 (Court of Claims, 1977)
Eldridge v. City of Palo Alto
57 Cal. App. 3d 613 (California Court of Appeal, 1976)
Pete v. United States
531 F.2d 1018 (Court of Claims, 1976)
Pete
202 Ct. Cl. 1109 (Court of Claims, 1973)
Johnson v. United States
479 F.2d 1383 (Court of Claims, 1973)
Izaak Walton League of America v. St. Clair
353 F. Supp. 698 (D. Minnesota, 1973)
State v. Nordstrom
253 A.2d 163 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1969)
Bydlon v. United States
175 F. Supp. 891 (Court of Claims, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 F. Supp. 891, 146 Ct. Cl. 764, 1959 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bydlon-v-united-states-cc-1959.