Butler v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Butler v. State

356 S.W.3d 881, 2012 WL 123101, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 40

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 17, 2012

DocketED 96365

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 356 S.W.3d 881 (Butler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Butler v. State, 356 S.W.3d 881, 2012 WL 123101, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 40 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Butler appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035 1 , following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2010, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Butler appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035 1 , following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2010, unless otherwise indicated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

356 S.W.3d 881, 2012 WL 123101, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butler-v-state-moctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack