Butler v. State

342 S.W.3d 927, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 898, 2011 WL 2552781
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 28, 2011
DocketED 95738
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 342 S.W.3d 927 (Butler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Butler v. State, 342 S.W.3d 927, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 898, 2011 WL 2552781 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Butler appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the *928 reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Lewis
342 S.W.3d 927 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
342 S.W.3d 927, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 898, 2011 WL 2552781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butler-v-state-moctapp-2011.