Butler v. State

399 S.W.3d 500, 2013 WL 2244631, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 612
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Butler v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 898
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 21, 2013·No. No. ED 98942·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Marvin Butler appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.151 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Burston v. State, 343 S.W.3d 691, 693 (Mo.App. E.D.2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Butler v. State, 399 S.W.3d 500, 2013 WL 2244631, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 612 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

399 S.W.3d 500 (Butler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burston v. State
343 S.W.3d 691 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)