State v. Brodie

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Brodie

356 S.W.3d 881, 2012 WL 117948, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 56

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 17, 2012·No. WD 72987·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Keith Brodie appeals his convictions following a jury trial on two counts of domestic assault in the third degree, section *882 565.074, RSMo Cum.Supp.2010. On appeal, Brodie claims that the trial court plainly erred in entering a judgment of conviction on the two counts because the second conviction violated his right to be free from double jeopardy in that the evidence showed that only one assault occurred. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The convictions are affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Keith Brodie appeals his convictions following a jury trial on two counts of domestic assault in the third degree, section *882 565.074, RSMo Cum.Supp.2010. On appeal, Brodie claims that the trial court plainly erred in entering a judgment of conviction on the two counts because the second conviction violated his right to be free from double jeopardy in that the evidence showed that only one assault occurred. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The convictions are affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Brodie, 356 S.W.3d 881, 2012 WL 117948, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 56 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

356 S.W.3d 881 (State v. Brodie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related