State v. Brodie

356 S.W.3d 881, 2012 WL 117948, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 56
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 17, 2012
DocketWD 72987
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 356 S.W.3d 881 (State v. Brodie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Brodie, 356 S.W.3d 881, 2012 WL 117948, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 56 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Keith Brodie appeals his convictions following a jury trial on two counts of domestic assault in the third degree, section *882 565.074, RSMo Cum.Supp.2010. On appeal, Brodie claims that the trial court plainly erred in entering a judgment of conviction on the two counts because the second conviction violated his right to be free from double jeopardy in that the evidence showed that only one assault occurred. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The convictions are affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Butler v. State
356 S.W.3d 881 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
356 S.W.3d 881, 2012 WL 117948, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-brodie-moctapp-2012.